<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Raelifin.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raelifin.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raelifin.com</link>
	<description>Deus ex Machina</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:22:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Consciousness Real? A Practical Answer. by Anthony</title>
		<link>http://raelifin.com/thoughts/is-consciousness-real-a-practical-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raelifin.com/?p=1170#comment-603</guid>
		<description>Just was covering a paper today in class by McGinn on how consciousness can be real, but outside of the powers of human conception.  Fun stuff.  Also, writing my term paper on the question of whether or not qualia matter, given that at least one popular conception holds that they are epiphenomenal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just was covering a paper today in class by McGinn on how consciousness can be real, but outside of the powers of human conception.  Fun stuff.  Also, writing my term paper on the question of whether or not qualia matter, given that at least one popular conception holds that they are epiphenomenal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Flash Project by Raelifin</title>
		<link>http://raelifin.com/code/first-flash-project/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Raelifin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raelifin.com/?p=1181#comment-598</guid>
		<description>Oops! You&#039;re right. I don&#039;t want to bother re-uploading it with the fix, but thanks for pointing that out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! You&#8217;re right. I don&#8217;t want to bother re-uploading it with the fix, but thanks for pointing that out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Flash Project by werqwerwer</title>
		<link>http://raelifin.com/code/first-flash-project/comment-page-1/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>werqwerwer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raelifin.com/?p=1181#comment-597</guid>
		<description>You set up chess board wrong.  Queens go on their color, ie. White queen should be on white square and black queen should be on black square.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You set up chess board wrong.  Queens go on their color, ie. White queen should be on white square and black queen should be on black square.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Flash Project by anne</title>
		<link>http://raelifin.com/code/first-flash-project/comment-page-1/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raelifin.com/?p=1181#comment-593</guid>
		<description>Ah, my son, Uber-hacker.  

Congratulations, looks like fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, my son, Uber-hacker.  </p>
<p>Congratulations, looks like fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Extremist Language by anne</title>
		<link>http://raelifin.com/thoughts/extremist-language/comment-page-1/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 16:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raelifin.com/?p=1154#comment-580</guid>
		<description>I think the real problem is that people mistake the government for culture.  Culturally, the British were ready to give up slavery, but the Americans (some of the States) were not.  In Western European culture women have always had (even Classical Roman women) many many more rights and freedoms than in the rest of the world.  In more fluid societies of pastoral people or nomadic people, women always have had more rights, same with lower caste men.  So this meme was part of culture and rich women had more freedom than poor men.  Part of a culture is that the rich always had more freedom than the poor.

None of this is part of government, nor should be.  Government should not enforce the MORALS or MEMES of a people, only insure that justice can be addressed.  I don&#039;t even think that government should protect people from each other, but only provide a way for victims to get some attention and even the score with those who attacked them.  This has to be in a public forum, which is what I think government should be.  A public forum where people can go and get attention about whatever is hurting them.  Then, again in public, DISINTERESTED parties as well as interested parties should fight and argue in the open about the situation brought up by the victim(s) in order to publicly enforce some kind of cultural shunning on the perpetrators, whether it is a fine or some kind of moral/memetic shaming.  

We get way, way too tied up in thinking that government is a greater family, to take care of the members of the clan.  That is a job for a family, not a government.  With the loss of family and clan, trying to invent an adoptive family and mix those responsibilities in with law and order gets really messy really fast.  Moral rules such as who should marry are not a part of law and order, but a preference of a clan.  My grandmother should be able to try to keep me from marrying someone, but not a band of strangers set up to address my need for justice should it arise.  

Government fails when it&#039;s expected to do things that it is not designed to do.  Like using a bed as a table, sort of works, but ultimately has problems.  Government and common law and group enforcement of justice are invaluable parts of a society.  Let&#039;s not force government to do the job of our mothers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the real problem is that people mistake the government for culture.  Culturally, the British were ready to give up slavery, but the Americans (some of the States) were not.  In Western European culture women have always had (even Classical Roman women) many many more rights and freedoms than in the rest of the world.  In more fluid societies of pastoral people or nomadic people, women always have had more rights, same with lower caste men.  So this meme was part of culture and rich women had more freedom than poor men.  Part of a culture is that the rich always had more freedom than the poor.</p>
<p>None of this is part of government, nor should be.  Government should not enforce the MORALS or MEMES of a people, only insure that justice can be addressed.  I don&#8217;t even think that government should protect people from each other, but only provide a way for victims to get some attention and even the score with those who attacked them.  This has to be in a public forum, which is what I think government should be.  A public forum where people can go and get attention about whatever is hurting them.  Then, again in public, DISINTERESTED parties as well as interested parties should fight and argue in the open about the situation brought up by the victim(s) in order to publicly enforce some kind of cultural shunning on the perpetrators, whether it is a fine or some kind of moral/memetic shaming.  </p>
<p>We get way, way too tied up in thinking that government is a greater family, to take care of the members of the clan.  That is a job for a family, not a government.  With the loss of family and clan, trying to invent an adoptive family and mix those responsibilities in with law and order gets really messy really fast.  Moral rules such as who should marry are not a part of law and order, but a preference of a clan.  My grandmother should be able to try to keep me from marrying someone, but not a band of strangers set up to address my need for justice should it arise.  </p>
<p>Government fails when it&#8217;s expected to do things that it is not designed to do.  Like using a bed as a table, sort of works, but ultimately has problems.  Government and common law and group enforcement of justice are invaluable parts of a society.  Let&#8217;s not force government to do the job of our mothers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Re: Conversations on Strong AI by Raelifin</title>
		<link>http://raelifin.com/thoughts/re-conversations-on-strong-ai/comment-page-1/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>Raelifin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 16:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raelifin.com/?p=1149#comment-568</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m walking into a conversation that Rod was having with someone else. I haven&#039;t read Conversations on Strong AI pt1, and I don&#039;t think it&#039;s required. The 4-part response is Rod&#039;s, he&#039;s writing to someone else. Everything I&#039;ve written is in the comments section below that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m walking into a conversation that Rod was having with someone else. I haven&#8217;t read Conversations on Strong AI pt1, and I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s required. The 4-part response is Rod&#8217;s, he&#8217;s writing to someone else. Everything I&#8217;ve written is in the comments section below that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Re: Conversations on Strong AI by David</title>
		<link>http://raelifin.com/thoughts/re-conversations-on-strong-ai/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 11:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raelifin.com/?p=1149#comment-567</guid>
		<description>I am having trouble following this conversation.  How many responses have there been?  Who started it?  Who wrote the 4 part response at the beginning of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am having trouble following this conversation.  How many responses have there been?  Who started it?  Who wrote the 4 part response at the beginning of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Questiondump Jan 2011 by Alrenous</title>
		<link>http://raelifin.com/thoughts/questiondump-jan-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Alrenous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raelifin.com/?p=764#comment-566</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t expect to run across such a good example.

&quot;When was the last time you did something for the first time?&quot;

Uhhh...recently? I can&#039;t remember what it was, though. It was this week. Or last. Anyway, not long ago. 
More generally, I can remember that I have a bad episodic memory, but I don&#039;t remember any specific episodes of failing to remember an episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t expect to run across such a good example.</p>
<p>&#8220;When was the last time you did something for the first time?&#8221;</p>
<p>Uhhh&#8230;recently? I can&#8217;t remember what it was, though. It was this week. Or last. Anyway, not long ago.<br />
More generally, I can remember that I have a bad episodic memory, but I don&#8217;t remember any specific episodes of failing to remember an episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Questiondump Jan 2011 by Alrenous</title>
		<link>http://raelifin.com/thoughts/questiondump-jan-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Alrenous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raelifin.com/?p=764#comment-565</guid>
		<description>&quot;Is there a qualitative difference between semantic memory and episodic memory (i.e. is episodic memory just memory of historical facts)?&quot;

Yes. I can&#039;t think of any reason why it needs to be that way, but yes. I know this because I have a ridiculously good semantic memory, but almost no episodic memory. I almost never takes notes because I don&#039;t need them. You&#039;d think I&#039;d be able to cast episodes as facts, but that only sort of works - I only remember caricatures of most events, and any non-unique event almost always gets rolled/compressed into the general fact that event X has occurred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is there a qualitative difference between semantic memory and episodic memory (i.e. is episodic memory just memory of historical facts)?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes. I can&#8217;t think of any reason why it needs to be that way, but yes. I know this because I have a ridiculously good semantic memory, but almost no episodic memory. I almost never takes notes because I don&#8217;t need them. You&#8217;d think I&#8217;d be able to cast episodes as facts, but that only sort of works &#8211; I only remember caricatures of most events, and any non-unique event almost always gets rolled/compressed into the general fact that event X has occurred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Questiondump Jan 2011 by ak600</title>
		<link>http://raelifin.com/thoughts/questiondump-jan-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>ak600</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 08:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raelifin.com/?p=764#comment-564</guid>
		<description>You find P(X&#124;~A) the same way you find P(X&#124;A), there&#039;s no difference at all. You can look at some empirical data or just make up a number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You find P(X|~A) the same way you find P(X|A), there&#8217;s no difference at all. You can look at some empirical data or just make up a number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

